Thursday 30 June 2011

Works permit regulations explained by Grant Russell

Thursday, 30 June 2011

Work permit regulations explained

This fine article below was written by STV'S Grant Russell!

The regulations in place for a footballer applying for a work permit to move to a UK club remain frequently misunderstood and misinterpreted.
Various outlets, officials and supporters have quoted varied rules from the past, many of which remain relevant but have moved on from the assumed requirements for a footballer to be given the necessary immigration status.
Previously, a club would apply direct to the Home Office for a work permit, with the well-known requirement being that a player had to have played 75 per cent of his nation’s competitive games within the last two years to qualify.

Now, the relevant governing body must endorse any work permit application by a club before it is submitted to the Home Office, cutting down on the number of requests made directly to Government which are unlikely to succeed first time.

Who needs a work permit?

Any player who is over 16 years old and is not from the European Economic Area, which covers 32 countries aside from the UK requires a work permit to play for a British club. A Commonwealth citizen with at least one grandparent who was born in the UK does not need to apply through the points based system. Such players will still require a work permit but go through a different process.

How to get a work permit

When a club signs a player who requires a work permit, they agree to sponsor the player to be in the UK, meaning they will provide the funds for his time in the country. A certificate of sponsorship is then produced by the club, which is then submitted to the relevant FA for them to consider an endorsement.

The Scottish FA’s rules on work permit endorsements follow the same guidelines as previously outlined by the Home Office. For the SFA to give their approval, the player in question must have played 75 per cent of his nation’s competitive games – excluding friendlies – in the two years prior to the date of application.

Furthermore, the country the player is coming from must be in the top 70 of Fifa’s rankings. Failure to meet these requirements results in an automatic rejection of any application for an SFA endorsement for a work permit certificate of sponsorship.

As of June 28, 2011, it costs an applicant £550 to apply by post for a work permit in the UK, or £850 in person to process the application on the same day. There is a reduction in cost for nationals from Croatia, Turkey or FYR Macedonia, with the same applications costing £495 and £765 respectively.

The appeals process

If an application is rejected, a club can then appeal to the governing body. An appeals panel will ultimately weigh up whether or not the player is, in their view, an internationally established player and whether another professional within the UK could not perform a similar role.

That appeals panel typically sits within three to five working days of an appeal submission and is made up of football experts, made up typically of former professionals. Officials from the league, the FA and the player’s union also sit on the panel to argue the case for the player being granted an endorsement.

In Scotland, experts who have sat on the decision panel previously include former player-turned-pundit Pat Nevin, one-time Motherwell boss Willie McLean – brother of Tommy and Jim – and former Hibernian and Liverpool midfielder Peter Cormack.

Status of immigration

The length of time a player can remain in the UK as a player depends on his grasp of the English language. There are two immigration statuses available to a player applying for a work permit: tier two and tier five.

Under tier two, a player can remain in the UK for an initial three years, with the possibility for an extension for a further two years. To qualify, the player must accrue 70 immigration points under the Home Office’s system. 50 are given for getting an FA endorsement, with 10 more given for being able to prove sufficient funding to remain in the country.

The final 10 are awarded on the basis of the player’s English. If the applicant comes from a predominantly English-speaking country, or has a degree from a course which was taught in English, the 10 points are subsequently awarded. Additionally, a player can sit an approved English language test upon their arrival in the UK to obtain tier two status.

Failing that, a player can apply for tier five status. Again, a certificate of sponsorship and proof of sponsorship is required but a visa is only valid for one year. However, the player can then sit an English language test within that year and apply to switch to tier two status.

The current Home Office financial criteria for a player to come to the UK outlines he must be continuously funded during his time in the country and has had at least £800 in his bank account for 90 consecutive days prior to the point of moving.

The process simplified
A football association will typically endorse a certificate of sponsorship for a player if he has played 75 per cent of competitive games for a FIFA ranked top 70 nation over the past two years. Under no circumstances will an FA endorse a certificate of sponsorship on the first attempt if the criteria is not met.
A club may then appeal if the first application is rejected. An appeals panel will then convene to establish whether, in their view, the player's transfer would be of benefit to the game in the relevant country. If they are in favour, the football association will then endorse the certificate, which then contributes the biggest part to the Home Office's criteria

Wednesday 22 June 2011

Why making the sign of the cross will never be an offence!

Wednesday, 22 June 2011
Why making the sign of the cross will never be an offence!
Alternative View June 22nd 2011
Matt McGlone
When new bills are in the process of being structured for the purpose of being passed through (in this case) the Scottish Parliament then it’s probably best that no comments are offered by Government Ministers when the bill has still to be finalised!
Much reaction appeared yesterday after Community Safety Minister Roseanna Cunningham made part comment on the new proposed proposed legislation for tackling sectarianism related to football bill. In my opinion she helped create emotive headlines by her comments for a bill which (A) has yet to be decided & (B) has yet to be made law!
Take the matter of the signing the cross.
It will NOT EVER be made an offence to do it in the correct religious manner for which it is intended. Whether you do it in Mass, praying at any time outside your home, on the street if for example you saw a horrible accident, before or after your dinner, for any sportsperson entering the field of play, or after for example, when a player scores a goal and he does it for his own personal reasons and NOT to DELIBERATELY Incite trouble, for example to away supporters etc. It’s common sense and by using the signing of the cross properly there will be no problem and it will never be an offence to do so!
The Roman Catholic Bishop of Motherwell, Joseph Devine said: "Any sign, song, picture or whatever can be easily abused.
"So the Minister is correct in saying that, in certain circumstances, such gestures can be provocative.
 "In themselves, the sign of the cross and the national anthem are noble and honourable expressions, but they can be manipulated for evil intent.
 "Those who intentionally and malevolently exploit and corrupt such eminent symbols should be held to account."
Roseanna Cunningham said”
"In the circumstances of Celtic and Rangers fans meeting each other on a crowded street, it could be construed as offensive.
Ask yourself why, if you are a practicing Roman Catholic, would you want to make the ‘sign of the cross’ under the above circumstances and think that is the proper way it should be used? It is a religious sign and not a sign of incitement!
As for singing the National Anthem, personally it means nothing to me and I have no reason for its words to ever pass through my lips, but for right or wrong it is the National Anthem of the UK and if others wish to sing it why should it bother us? Again if it is used in provocative fashion it can be viewed as incitement, and again that is quite correct!   
TOP QC Paul McBride last night praised the new anti-sectarianism bill and said:
 "Common sense will prevail." McBride, who has represented Celtic and manager Neil Lennon, said: "I think it is a very good bill which, despite what some say, is very well drafted.
"It only creates two offences. The threatening communications part is very simple. And the football part clearly defines what you can and can't do.
"Most sensible folk will support it. People know what is offensive and what isn't."
Mr McBride claimed detractors of the bill would try to point to "extreme examples".
Adding "When we had bills to combat racism, some people said it would mean we could never use the word 'black' in public. That was nonsense.
"So making religious signs or singing the national anthem won't come into it. Common sense will prevail."
Commonsense, proper & correct use of religious signs or any country’s national anthem will not get anybody arrested. It would be a bit rich to say you cannot fly the Union flag in this country but we can fly the Irish Tricolour, would it not?
Finally, does anyone really think that the current SNP Government wishes to alienate 850,000 Roman Catholics in Scotland at the polling stations. Nope!




Saturday 18 June 2011

Phil beat them to it, but wonderfully Whyte spin will come from Ibrox!

Alternative View
18th June 2011

Matt McGlone

Be assured their new ‘Director of Football’ Gordon Smith, will be taking more than a passing interest of the PR coming out of Ibrox!  

He has been working solidly in & around the press since he retired long ago, apart from his short spell at the SFA, and those press contacts are set in friendship & stone.

But as Chick Young that ever so eloquent of sports writers (sic) who is a very close mate, as is the other blabbering & blubbering tank Derek Johnstone, who were being primed & were about to break the story, in nipped several hours earlier, the effervescent, sprightly minded, ahead of the real game, our very own Alternative View columnist, Phil MacGiolla Bhain!

Phil keeps his contacts in that Fork Knox mental safe of his, and although he would never work for mainstream tabloids in Scotland, the editors of these newspaper (I say ‘newspapers’ loosely) know how much of a diamond he is!     

With the media Spaniels now panting in line, tit-bits will be plentiful in the press & media and Rangers will now more or less get a free run with how they wish a headline & a story to appear, (what’s new I hear you say). Angles in how the same story is written & presented will be written with their chums approval. Have no doubt about that!

Although that Irish Wolfhound Phil will no doubt be more than a paw print ahead of them!    

Only this morning some of his BBC colleagues when making press announcements about his new role at Ibrox were referring to him as ‘Smudger’ which is his nickname. No doubt ‘Smudger’ will be repaying them & will be less than a phone call away in the future!

As their new ‘borrow borrow’ saviour Craig Whyte, who will hardly be around Ibrox put it this morning "Working in London some of the time can give me a little escape from the goldfish bowl of Glasgow - and I will use it to make sure I am fresh to be at my best on Rangers business." Yes, a real PR fast spinner already ‘Fresh to be at my best for Rangers business.’ In other words I’ll hardly be here but make it look good, chummys!




Friday 17 June 2011

The new proposed sectarian bill should make no difference to us!

The Alternative View

June 17th 2011  
Matt McGlone

In reality what brought today’s Scottish Government's proposed legislation for tackling sectarianism related to football to a head, was the disgraceful Ned behaviour of a number of Rangers players in our Scottish Cup victory at Celtic Park earlier this year.

What also tipped it all over the edge was the snide behaviour of the housewives favourite, the every so funny Ally McCoist. So funny (sic) that he felt he had to wind up Neil after his players had committed everything under the sun against the laws of the game on the pitch the same evening.

Yes, when it’s all going against them on the pitch, when on the night they couldn’t compete, the best thing to do was to create a diversion. Which is exactly what they did. Instead of the headlines being about our victory and them out the cup it was Neil’s angry face thrust towards McCoist’s.

What angered Neil so much in that specific incident was not so much the fact that McCoist aggressively warned Neil ‘not to take issue with any of his players during the game’ no, it was the fact that Neil offered his hand in a friendly gesture, only for McCoist to wind him up in truly in-your-ear sneaky fashion.

That kicked off the Police & Scottish Government Summit and after years of turning a blind eye they will now jail people for up to possibly 5 years for sectarian behaviour!

Now political chants & sectarian chants are two different things! Are political chants required at a football match? That is a question everyone has to ask themselves!

Importantly if anyone is getting lifted then it’s crucial the courts and the police know the difference.

Rangers said today "There is no place in football for sectarian behaviour."  Now don’t laugh just yet or fall off your perch, because we’ll see what they do about it, and they have no history of really doing anything serious, do they?

Rangers FC’s blanket denial of at least 11 instances of sectarian singing & chanting at this year’s League Cup Final is their current track record, & it’s all on tape for verification!

Our songs must always be about support & encouragement towards the players on the park whether Catholic or Protestant or any religion or nationality, singing happily whilst recalling the proud achievements and history of our Club. The tradition of the club we are mentally woven into is proud and it stands morally tall with decent societies throughout the world!

Let’s keep it that, like we have done.

And remember we don’t have the problem!

  

Wednesday 15 June 2011

Digest very carefully the intent of the back page press splashes!

Alternative View June 15th

Digest what you will from giant back page headlines and decipher the facts, if there are any, with what the press & media are currently offering.

At the moment it's silly season because there is a lull in the transfer market, due to three main reasons. Clubs are still focussing on their targets. Many players are not out of contract until the end of June, and players & Club chief executives still off on holiday, therefore any real (and there will be a few) negotiations are slow!

When you see a story loaded with quotes from what is described as an 'insider' then unless someone (from within a club) wishes to deliberately plant a story, then it is generally made up, simply because the paper printing the story do NOT have any real facts on it so they just say an 'insider'.

Perhaps you don't, but believe it or not, some people will believe what they read in the papers, otherwise they wouldn't be selling around 340,000 copies per day in Scotland!

Take today's 'Sun' for example :

(1) "SunSport understands £25,000-a-week Brown will happily sign a new contract - IF Lennon gets a deal of his own."
Just look at the language there! Take that as pure rubbish!

(2) "Should Lennon stay, it seems certain his first act will be offering his midfield general a new long-term deal."
Should Lennon stay, honestly its silly now!

(3)  A close pal said: "Scott knows he could probably go down south and get a lot of money. But the fact is he's absolutely loved it under Neil, he's made no secret of that."
Don't see the the orderly queue of buying clubs forming?

(4)  "He's also made it clear he is the only man for the job at this moment in time."
This is written so badly the reader is not sure if it is Scott or Neil who is meant to be saying the above! If it is Scott then make your own mind up on that one!

(5) "Scott is happy in Glasgow and really enjoying his football. He already had initial talks about a new contract a few weeks ago and if a deal was put in front of him then I think there would be no doubt he would be happy to sign it."
If this "close pal" of Scott thinks that Celtic will be offering Scott a new 4 or 5 year deal on £25,000 pw then it's time he visited a decent therapist!
Dafty press season it is!






Tuesday 14 June 2011

Seems like the plate of succulent lamb at Ibrox wasn't full enough for some?

Alternative View

June 14th 2011

Wasn't sure what to have a chuckle at first, the fact that the Daily Record buried this story away down at the bottom of their football website, or the fact that their Rangers supporting journo, Keith Jackson, found that he he had the shrunken prunes to dare write it.

My goodness a story that many of us have been banging on about for ages, which is, Craig Whyte is on the borrow borrow Leeds United style to fund his new south side purchase! But crucially, it's now being written & published in the Scottish press. How long could they have held out for? Well, this long it seems
 
Apparently "Analysts say the document - called an MG50 - could signal Whyte's intent to mortgage off the next four years' worth of season-ticket money as a security against some form of loan.
It was this kind of high-risk scheme which was blamed for the crisis that saw Leeds plummet into the third tier of English football and almost forced them out of business."

Therefore what all this means is that with the reported £18m that Whyte got his hands on to pay some cash back to the bank, if it all goes belly up then he is first in line, yes and before the taxman, to get as much back as possible because Whyte will be the preferred creditor.

This bundle of money we are told McCoist will get to buy players will come from the next four seasons of season ticket money that will be mortgaged off as security to borrow the cash. Risky. too right it is!

Jackson & McCoist are very close and Jackson would not have run this story without a nod from his his buddy, who it would seem is getting very frustrated as to where and when any money will appear to fund signings. As usual we await with more than a passing interest!


 

Sunday 12 June 2011

Of course the Tynecastle attack on Neil WAS preventable!

Davie Provan today said "Commonsense should prevail when the SPL investigate the attack on Neil as there were 300 cops & stewards on duty but they still couldn't stop the lunatic getting onto the pitch"
That's a bit like saying you have security around the back of your house but you still left your front door opened and the attacker got in!
If you look at any of the pictures on the night, the attacker ran at least 25 yards from his seat past many people unchallenged.
All the police or stewards had to do was to have some security around the dug-out area, because believe it or not, that's where the guy was standing who was having his life threatened! And why weren't the police or stewards not facing the crowd. Plus the two standing at the tunnel were the last to react as they were too busy watching the match. TV evidence shows this!
Yeah, hard for the police & stewards to work out putting at least one person where Neil was when they were organising their 300 strong squad.
The security around Neil was non-existent and all the pictures on the night clearly display that!  

Friday 10 June 2011

Surely we are not playing hard ball with Kayal?

It's obviously important we tie up our best players in the fight ahead and Lennon for one will most ceratainly want Beram Kayal as a solid fixture in midfield, but talks on a new contract are dragging on and Kayal himself has now come out and added a few comments which clearly show things are near to stalling.  
Beram said today: “It’s very important to play for who wants you most, I enjoy it at Celtic and I want to stay but who knows what might happen in the next few weeks. But they must treat me at the level I deserve”
That talk tells you everything. He is frustrated.
The player is on a reported £7,000 pw and he is also aware that Scott Brown for example is on £23,000 pw & Joe Ledley on £27,000 pw. Therefore it's fair he's due a rise,yes?
Peter Lawwell is the negotiator and if Celtic are serious about keeping Kayal and not looking to making him feel less than some others, then, is an offer of £20,000 pw unfair?
My opinion is that it's not, and they should be offerring the player around that amount to make him feel as if he's worth as much as his midfield partners!
IF Celtic are playing hard-ball and treating the player shabbily then on Peter Lawwell's head it will fall.
The last three SPL trophies have went to Rangers and although the the books must be balanced we must also keep & show respect good players.
No more corner shop attitude. WE WANT TITLES & TROPHIES!  

Thursday 9 June 2011

THE BBC RESPONSE IS AS OFFENSIVE AS THE ORIGINAL COMMENTS MADE!

By Matt McGlone, June 9th, 2011.
The response from the BBC to just under a thousand or more Celtic fans who contacted them regarding comments made at half time on the BBC Scotland Cup Final programme on May 23rd, were about as offensive and insulting as the original comments made by Rob McLean. For the avoidance of any doubt this is what McLean said:  "I'd love to go through a football show without mentioning the word "sectarian" but I feel we are going to have to at half-time because those outside that can hear the songs being sung, tell me that the Celtic supporters have been singing some sectarian songs during the first half despite Celtic going very public with their intimation that they wanted it completely stamped out. Lots of publicity for Rangers, punishment for Rangers from UEFA as well, it seems as if it is happening outside from the Celtic supporters". (Now before we go any further here, if Rob McLean is being used as a patsy or a pawn, then he is an experienced enough journalist/broadcaster to check out his facts that he is clearly accountable for!) 
For those at the match it is clear there was nothing sectarian sung! Therefore when making such a statement you really have to back it up. But he couldn’t! Some of the Celtic fans who complained got a response today from the BBC complaints department! And to be honest it was pretty pathetic! The main thrust of their reply is repeated below. This is convoluted at its best when they say:   There is a continuing debate around the definition of "sectarian" and we accept that it would have been more accurate for our presenter to refer to "songs that some people believe to be an expression of sectarianism but which many people nonetheless find both offensive and provocative". Going by that muddled effort above it is quite clear they have a problem defining the word ‘Sectarian’ taken from any English Dictionary. Or do they wish to re-write the meaning just to suit themselves?
They also have a recording of Rob McLean’s words but they seem not to understand them either when they say:   At the half time interval of our live television broadcast of this year's Scottish Cup Final the presenter and one of the guests briefly mentioned that sectarian singing had been heard coming from a minority of Celtic fans” .Incorrect because McLean does not use the word “Minority”, therefore why introduce it in the reply to the fans when it wasn’t said by Rob McLean in the first place? In a court of law the adding of certain words unsaid in evidence would be the difference between a verdict of guilty & not guilty! For the BBC to write such inaccuracies in replies to complaints, it raises some pretty serious issues as to their attitude to the sectarian problem in Scotland and their role within it as broadcasters! The support have done their bit and by their response we now recognise BBC Scotland for what they are. Celtic FC must now take the BBC response further, because it is unacceptable and we have to operate within this environment and be treated fairly and accurately! Anything less would be a dereliction of duty from Celtic FC to its supporters!